The U.S. Senate’s version of the CLARITY Act has hit another roadblock. According to new report, the updated draft expected this week still does not have broad support from Senate Democrats. Therefore, negotiations remain active before lawmakers can schedule a floor vote.
The disagreement comes even as the crypto industry continues pushing for the bill. It is widely viewed as one of the biggest efforts to establish clear rules for digital assets in the United States.
Democrats Want More Safeguards
At a Capitol Hill press conference, Senators Chris Murphy, Jeff Merkley, Chris Van Hollen, and Elizabeth Warren argued that passing the CLARITY Act without addressing Trump’s crypto interests would create a regulatory framework. However, it would also allow elected officials to continue profiting from digital assets.
Murphy said there is little value in creating new crypto regulations if they fail to prevent what Democrats describe as conflicts of interest. Furthermore, the group wants language that limits senior government officials, including the president, from maintaining personal crypto business interests while in office.
The White House has previously indicated it supports ethics rules that apply equally to everyone. However, it opposes provisions aimed at a single officeholder.
Senate Math Becomes the Biggest Challenge
The political numbers are making negotiations even more difficult.
Republicans currently control 52 Senate seats, but the CLARITY Act requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. That means at least seven Democratic senators must support the bill.
With several Democrats publicly opposing the current version, the legislation risks stalling unless both parties reach a compromise on ethics provisions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune continues to push for a vote before the August 10 recess. Meanwhile, Senator Cynthia Lummis has said updated bill text should be released within days.
Ripple Defends the Bill
Not everyone agrees with the Democratic approach.
Ripple’s global co-head of public policy, Lauren Belive, argued that rejecting the CLARITY Act would ultimately hurt crypto users rather than politicians. According to Belive, the bill would improve consumer protection and reduce regulatory uncertainty. This uncertainty currently exposes investors to bad actors.
Meanwhile, Lummis continues to frame the legislation as a financial freedom issue rather than an ethics debate.
Crypto Market Watches Every Move
The political uncertainty is already influencing market sentiment.
Polymarket’s odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 have dropped sharply from around 82% in February to roughly 36%. This shift reflects growing skepticism.
Institutional demand has shown mixed signals. During the latest week, spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $197 million in inflows, while Ethereum ETFs added $84.4 million. This ended eight consecutive weeks of outflows. Solana ETFs also posted modest inflows. On the other hand, XRP ETFs saw $7.18 million in net outflows, making XRP the only major U.S. spot crypto ETF category to record weekly withdrawals.
The next major development will likely come from negotiations between Senate leaders and the White House. The final wording on ethics provisions could determine whether the CLARITY Act advances this summer or faces another delay.
Was this writing helpful?
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Read the Next News
