Although there is a statement from the AK Party that there will be revisions for the articles that attracted reactions, the March 2 draft continues to be discussed in the Turkish Grand National Assembly. Starting from the second session of the talks, which started at 14:00, the omnibus law, which includes cryptocurrencies, started to be discussed. 2 MPs from each party made statements.
Cryptocurrency Tax Disclosures
For the last 2 hours, İsmail Faruk Aksu (MHP Istanbul) and Ümit Özlale (CHP İzmir) cryptocurrency tax He spoke about the law. Since there are many different issues in the omnibus law, from privatization to paid military service and even BOTAŞ, MPs do not include crypto on their agenda. In his statement, İsmail Faruk Aksu explained the purpose of the March 2 draft and expressed his support.
Ümit Özlale – CHP İzmir Mv. His speech on cryptocurrency tax regulation. https://t.co/KRgyBwxMzn pic.twitter.com/gukKhN8Kwl
— (@Media) March 25, 2026
CHP Izmir Deputy Ümit Özlale criticized the draft. cryptocurrency Özlale said that the government, which wanted to pave the way for the markets, blocked the market with legal regulations and said, “There is a contradiction here.”
“For example, India imposed a 30% tax on cryptocurrencies. Then investors fled from there. This is a choice. But if you say that you will regulate and develop the crypto market, and on the other hand, block the exchanges with these regulations, then you will not do anything right.
In other words, with these omnibus laws, I do not fully understand what the AK Party and valuable bureaucrats want to do regarding crypto assets.
There is also a double standard. For example, you are an investor, if you invest your money in the local stock market, you pay 10% withholding tax. But if you want to evaluate your investment abroad, there is a declaration procedure. Which investor prefers the domestic crypto asset market here?
As I said, my concern here is not to pave the way for the crypto market. But the regulations made contradict each other. “They are not regulations that reveal the government’s clear preference.”
