A pro-Ripple legal expert, John Deaton, has elucidated on a probable settlement scenario between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple instead of proceeding to trial. Here are the key points from his discussion:
- Settlement Instead of Trial:
- Deaton postulates that a trial is unlikely due to a recent decision viewed as a setback for the SEC. He questions the SEC’s ability to prove its case, advocating for the consideration of a settlement or dismissal of charges to avoid the complexities of a trial.
- Despite a trial date set for April 2024, Deaton boldly predicts that a trial might not occur due to the slender odds of SEC’s success, weak evidence, and hefty legal costs associated with the case.
- Settlement Discussions:
- There have been arrangements for legal counsel representing Ripple and the SEC to engage in settlement discussions before a crucial pretrial conference scheduled for April 16, 2024.
- US District Judge Analisa Torres mandated Ripple and the SEC to discuss a potential settlement, showcasing a legal pathway toward resolving the lawsuit outside of court.
- Factors Influencing Settlement:
- Deaton emphasizes that any potential settlement should avoid negatively impacting other crypto-related lawsuits, reflecting the broader implications of the Ripple case on the crypto industry.
- He also points out that the SEC is engaged in other significant legal battles with companies like Coinbase and Binance, which could strain their resources and add complexity to their efforts, thus potentially making a settlement with Ripple a more appealing option.
- Potential Reduction of Claim Amount:
- In upcoming hearings before Judge Torres, there might be debates over the appropriate settlement amount, with Ripple likely aiming to reduce the initial $770,000,000 claim by excluding sales related to On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) and arguing for the inclusion of legitimate business expenses.
- Impact on Crypto Industry:
- Deaton expresses concerns over the limited scope of the ruling, which could leave many projects in a regulatory gray area, thus potentially discouraging innovation in the U.S. He underscores the crypto industry’s ongoing quest for comprehensive regulatory clarity for sustained growth and leadership in blockchain technology.
These points encapsulate the crux of Deaton’s argument for a possible settlement between the SEC and Ripple, reflecting on the broader implications for the crypto industry amidst the legal quandaries facing Ripple and other crypto enterprises.
