news-image
Headlines

US DOJ Pushes for Extension; Will SBF’s Bail Be Revoked Again?

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the former CEO of the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, is set to go on trial in October on charges of fraud and money laundering. If convicted, SBF could face up to 100 years in prison. We’ve broken down the key developments to note as the trial draws near.

DOJ’s Accusations

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has leveled seven fraud charges against SBF. These include wire fraud against FTX customers, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud involving Alameda Research lenders, securities fraud targeting FTX investors, commodities fraud affecting FTX customers, and money laundering. SBF vehemently maintains his innocence, and his legal team is employing various strategies to prolong the trial proceedings.

Also Read: Tensions Rise as SBF and DOJ Prepare for Landmark Crypto Trial

Why Was a Trial Extension Requested?

The DOJ has submitted a request to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, urging an extension of the trial’s duration in the case of Sam Bankman-Fried. While the trial’s scheduled commencement date is October 3, prosecutors argue that more time is necessary during the first week to ensure efficient witness testimonies and trial proceedings. Their request aims to include October 6 as part of the trial’s initial week.

The DOJ’s primary focus is accommodating the travel schedules of out-of-town witnesses and maintaining an efficient pace to make the best use of the jury’s time. In contrast, the defense opposes this extension, emphasizing the need for ample preparation time.

Status of SBF’s Bail

Following allegations of witness tampering, SBF’s bail has been revoked, and Judge Kaplan recently denied his request for pretrial release. SBF’s legal team and prosecutors will present their arguments regarding his potential release to a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the coming days. Before SBF’s bail request, FTX initiated a lawsuit against SBF’s parents, Allan Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried.

The lawsuit aims to recover millions of dollars allegedly transferred and misappropriated by SBF’s parents during the early years of FTX.

John Deaton’s Insights

Prominent figure John Deaton has raised questions about the Department of Justice’s compromised approach to the case, drawing parallels to the SEC and other federal agencies in need of reform. Deaton has publicly criticized certain political figures who appear to have shielded SBF’s parents, notably calling out Senator Elizabeth Warren and prominent Democratic party members.

Also Read: Legal Expert John Deaton Raises Concerns Over the SEC and DOJ’s Impartiality

As Sam Bankman-Fried braces for his October trial, these developments underscore the substantial legal challenges and controversies surrounding the case.

Related posts

Understanding How Bitcoin Spark Innovates

EdaFace Admin

Here’s Where Michael van de Poppe Believes is a Good Buying Opportunity for Bitcoin

EdaFace Admin

Sparklo (SPRK) Continues to Offer More Utility Than Optimism (OP) and ZCash (ZEC)

EdaFace Admin

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More