Technical analyst with more than 40 years of experience Peter BrandtTargeted crypto currency investors via x. Brandt, saying, “There is no winner,” he said, “Most of you are stupid enough to debt to find money on the pizza” used. This harsh output stunned more than 800 thousand followers and fueled the discussions. Then Strategy’s founding partner Michael Saylor, Bitcoin $114,988.95He replied by describing the “entity that is governed by a protocol and circulating in an ideology -based network”.
Brandt’s criticism of Bitcoin community
Peter Brandt argued that the crypto money market was treated as a “religious belief .. According to him, Bitcoin is an entity that can only be bought and sold, and the expectation of “will correct your life” is not realistic. He pointed out that instead of gaining practical gains in their daily lives of investors who are overly passionate, he pointed out.
Brandt, who referred to his long history in the commodity markets, added that the community found it irrational to speculate by borrowing. “Go and set up a life,” he advised investors to enrich their lives in other fields instead of over -tied to crypto money. This output attracted the attention of both its supporters and opponents.
Philosophical and Technical Emphasis from Saylor
Michael SaylorBrandt’s output by targeting the definition of “being” He answered. To him, Bitcoin is a circulating being. It is traded on a network and the rules are coded in the protocol. This triple quality reveals that Bitcoin has an ideological dimension beyond financial boundaries.
Saylor’s definition reminded the crypto currency community that Bitcoin is not only an investment tool, but also a wider vision. These perspective debates re -exacerbated the technological and ideological foundations of crypto money on the axis.
Responsibility Rejection: The information contained in this article does not contain investment advice. Investors should be aware that crypto currencies carry high volatility and thus risk and carry out their operations in line with their own research.
