HyperLiquid (HYPE) price has corrected nearly 20% from its recent high near $69, slipping back toward the $60 mark despite what initially appeared to be a bullish regulatory development. Earlier this week, the Hyperliquid Policy Center and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP met with the U.S. SEC to discuss the future of crypto regulation in the United States, a development that briefly lifted sentiment around the token.
Instead of extending its recovery, HYPE has come under renewed selling pressure. At the same time, on-chain data shows large holders transferring hundreds of thousands of HYPE to centralized exchanges, reinforcing fears of distribution after the token’s strong multi-month rally. With the price now approaching the key $50-$51 support zone, traders are asking a more important question than why HYPE is falling: Is this the kind of capitulation that often marks a local bottom, or does the current price action increase the odds of a deeper correction toward $40?
HyperLiquid Whale Outflows Raise Distribution Concerns
One of the biggest catalysts behind HYPE’s recent correction has been a series of large whale transfers to centralized exchanges. On-chain data shows multiple high-value transactions over the past 24 hours, with wallets moving more than 437,000 HYPE (worth approximately $28.4 million) to exchanges including OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io.
Several individual transfers exceeded 100,000 HYPE, reinforcing concerns that large holders may be locking in profits after HyperLiquid’s strong rally over the past few months. While exchange inflows don’t necessarily confirm immediate selling, they often increase market caution because tokens moved to trading platforms are more likely to be sold than those held in private wallets.
Is HyperLiquid Entering a Capitulation Phase?
HyperLiquid’s weekly chart suggests the current sell-off is testing a critical turning point rather than confirming a long-term trend reversal. After failing to sustain its breakout above $68, HYPE has retraced toward the $50-$51 support zone, where an ascending trendline intersects with a previous breakout level. Despite the nearly 20% pullback from its recent highs, the broader market structure remains constructive.
The RSI is retreating from overbought conditions while remaining above the neutral 50 level. This suggests bullish momentum has weakened but has not yet flipped decisively in favor of sellers. Meanwhile, CMF remains marginally positive, indicating that capital outflows have been limited despite the recent decline. Selling volume has also remained relatively contained, rather than showing the sharp spike typically associated with panic-driven liquidations.
Together, these signals imply that the current correction resembles profit-taking within an established uptrend, although a decisive break below $50 would weaken this outlook and expose HYPE to a deeper correction toward the $40 support region.
Key Levels to Watch
- Immediate Resistance: $60 to $62
- Major Resistance: $68 to $70
- Immediate Support: $50 to $51
- Major Support: $40 to $42
- Bullish Invalidation: A decisive close below $50
- Bearish Invalidation: A rise above $70
Is HyperLiquid’s Correction Nearing Its End?
HyperLiquid’s recent decline appears to be driven by a combination of whale profit-taking, weakening momentum, and broader market pressure rather than a breakdown in its underlying fundamentals. While large exchange inflows from major holders accelerated the sell-off, the higher-timeframe chart still shows HYPE trading above its long-term trendline, keeping the broader bullish structure intact.
For now, the $50-$51 support zone remains the most important level to watch for the Hyperliquid (HYPE) price rally. A successful defense could mark this correction as a healthy reset within the broader uptrend and pave the way for a recovery toward the $68-$70 resistance zone. However, a decisive break below $50 would invalidate the current structure and increase the probability of a deeper correction toward $40.
Until either scenario plays out, traders should focus less on whale headlines and more on whether price, volume, and derivatives data begin to confirm genuine exhaustion among sellers.
Was this writing helpful?
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Read the Next News
