Is XRP Actually ISO20022 Compliant? A Legal Expert Just Changed the Conversation
The discussion around XRP and ISO20022 has been running for years. Some claim XRP is “ISO20022 compliant,” while others completely reject that idea. The reality sits somewhere in between.
ISO20022 is a messaging standard used by banks, while XRP operates in liquidity and settlement. Mixing these two roles has led to constant back-and-forth between analysts, developers, and the wider crypto community.
Bill Morgan Breaks It Down
Legal expert Bill Morgan stepped in to clear things up, pushing back on critics like ScamDetective5.
Instead of arguing that XRP is directly compliant, Morgan explained the actual structure. XRP works through Ripple’s Interledger Protocol (ILP), which acts as a bridge for value transfer.
What he meant is quite simple:
- ISO20022 → handles messaging
- ILP → handles liquidity and settlement
“Ripple has also played a big part in the evolution of this messaging layer for traditional finance. Ripple joined the ISO20022 Standards Board in 2020 and influenced the direction it took for cross-border uses and extending the standard to DLTs.” He stated
In short, Ripple has played a role in shaping ISO20022 standards and built its payment systems to align with them. That creates indirect compatibility, even if XRP itself isn’t “compliant” in the traditional sense.
Analysts Push Back Hard
The response was quick. ScamDetective5 challenged Morgan, asking how an XRP payment could actually be executed through ISO20022 and whether the same logic would apply to Bitcoin, since it can also interact with ILP.
“Can you show me how to make an ISO 20022 XRP payment via ISO?”
And more pointedly — “Since Bitcoin is also interoperable with ILP, is it also indirectly interoperable with ISO 20022?”
Adding to the debate, Vincent Van Code explained that no blockchain is technically ISO20022 compliant. Instead, systems like Ripple Payments use a translator layer to connect with the standard.
Others maintained that ISO20022 opens the door for assets like XRP to integrate with SWIFT-based systems, reinforcing the broader adoption narrative.
Where Things Actually Stand
Morgan doubled down, asking critics to point out what exactly in his explanation was wrong. His stance remains focused on technical accuracy rather than labels.
In simple terms, XRP isn’t the messaging layer; it’s the liquidity engine behind it. And that distinction is exactly why this debate keeps coming back.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
