Famous finance writer and investor Robert Kiyosaki came to the fore again with his latest post on social media. While the author of the book “Rich Dad Poor Dad” announced that he bought another Bitcoin for approximately 67 thousand dollars, he repeated his claim that crypto money will be a better investment than gold in the long term. However, Kiyosaki’s recent statements are not only receiving support; Criticism is also growing due to allegations of inconsistency.
Kiyosaki explained his purchasing decision with two main reasons. First, he expressed the view that the US debt crisis would weaken the dollar and the central bank would accelerate money printing. As the second reason, he emphasized that Bitcoin is approaching its maximum supply limit. According to him, with the completion of the 21 million supply, Bitcoin may become a stronger store of value against gold due to its scarcity advantage.
How Realistic is the “21 Million Bitcoin” Argument?
Kiyosaki’s most striking claim is that cryptocurrency will become superior to gold when the last Bitcoin is mined. Indeed, nearly 20 million Bitcoins have been mined to date. However, due to the structure of the Bitcoin network, it will take much longer for the last remaining million supply to be mined. The “halving” mechanism, which occurs every four years, dramatically extends the process by halving the new Bitcoin production rate.
According to experts, the date when the last Bitcoin will be mined indicates approximately 2140. This shows that this turning point is a theoretical threshold for most of today’s investors. Kiyosaki’s preference for Bitcoin over gold is not new; The investor has previously argued that limited supply is the strongest defense against inflationary monetary systems.
Criticisms of Inconsistency and Reaction from the Community
Despite this, Kiyosaki’s statements continue to create controversy in the crypto community. The author, who said in a post in February that he stopped buying Bitcoin after the level of 6 thousand dollars, mentioned his purchases above 100 thousand dollars in other statements. This situation brought criticism of “inconsistency” on social media.
On the other hand, not only individual investor statements but also corporate moves determine the agenda in the market. For example, MicroStrategy’s recent Bitcoin purchases and reserves added to its balance sheet reveal that corporate demand continues. Analysts state that, unlike individual comments, such concrete purchases have a more lasting impact on market perception. The institutional side’s long-term strategy continues to reinforce Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative.
Although Kiyosaki’s statements are among the popular discourses affecting investor psychology, they are not the only factor determining the direction of the market. In the crypto market, data is as important as narrative; Supply dynamics, institutional entries and macroeconomic conditions are evaluated together. Therefore, although Kiyosaki’s views are remarkable, it is often emphasized that investors should act with a broader perspective.
Looking at the overall picture, Kiyosaki’s positioning of Bitcoin as an alternative to gold is not a new discussion. However, inconsistent statements and uncertainties about timing cause investors to approach such comments cautiously. As the crypto market grows, data-driven analysis is expected to come to the fore rather than personal opinions.
