Netflix is one of the world’s largest streaming platforms and is often at the center of tech-related rumors. Now, a new claim is spreading across X and Web3 communities that Netflix is in talks with MetaMask to allow Ethereum-based subscription payments.
The rumor gained huge attention, so Coinpedia stepped in to fact-check whether the claim is real or just another false alarm.
Who Made This Claim?
The claim appears to have originated from social media posts on X from crypto-focused accounts like Coinvo, CryptoNews_eth, and PandaAsiaStreet, all citing vague “reports” that Netflix is exploring Ethereum payments through MetaMask wallets.
But is this claim true? Let’s break it down.
Coinpedia’s Key Findings: What’s Actually True?
No Official Confirmation From Netflix or MetaMask
Coinpedia’s review of Netflix’s press pages, and there hasn’t been any public statement or announcement confirming talks or partnerships related to Ethereum subscriptions.
However, such genuine partnerships involving major brands are always disclosed by both parties.
No Evidence in Netflix’s Payment Roadmap
Netflix currently supports traditional payment methods, including credit cards, debit cards, and region-specific options.
There is no mention of crypto payments, Ethereum, or MetaMask in Netflix’s official payment documentation or investor communications.
MetaMask Has Not Announced Any Netflix Collaboration
MetaMask usually announces big partnerships publicly, but there is no mention of Netflix anywhere, not on its website, blog, or official X account.
While MetaMask has recently partnered with firms like Meld for fiat on-ramps and Bridge for stablecoins, none of these relate to Netflix or any streaming service. The project’s focus remains on wallet features, staking, and rewards programs, not entertainment partnerships.
Industry Experts Urge Caution
Crypto analysts warn that viral claims about big-brand crypto integrations often lack verification. Without confirmation from primary sources, such rumors should be treated as speculation.
Similar claims involving Amazon, Apple, and other tech giants in the past were later proven false.
Summary Table: Coinpedia’s Evidence Against the Theory
| Claim Made by Theory | Coinpedia’s Counter-Evidence |
| Netflix in talks with MetaMask | No official statement from either company |
| MetaMask partnership confirmed | No mention on MetaMask’s official channels |
| Social media leaks prove talks | Speculation only, no verifiable sources |
Conclusion
| Claim | Is Netflix in talks with MetaMask to integrate Ethereum-based subscriptions |
| Verdict | ❌ False |
| Fact-Check by Coinpedia | As per Coinpedia research and a review of official sources, there is no credible or verifiable evidence that Netflix is in talks with MetaMask or planning Ethereum-based subscription payments.Until then this claim remains unverified and speculative. |
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
