The Terra Luna Classic (Lunc) community is divided by the arrival of a new governance proposal. While the proposal is suggested that the network may harm the functioning and decentralized structure of the network, supporters argue that it will make the decision -making mechanism more efficient. While the disagreements within the community caused controversy, the lack of adequate participation in the critical vote drew attention.
Governance proposal and community reaction
The governance proposal on the agenda aims to create a sub -DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) in the Terra Classic network. With this structure, decision -making processes are planned to become more decentralized. At the same time, the establishment of a special team for emergencies is also within the scope of the proposal. Supporters argue that this regulation will accelerate the decision -making mechanism and increase the efficiency of the network.
However, those who oppose the proposal claim that the principles of decentralization may be damaged. The popular LUNC verifier Mrdiamondhandz described this arrangement as the “worst initiative of recent times”. Mrdiamondhandz stated that the structure of the network of the network may be in danger and said, “If this proposal is approved, there may be serious problems in the functioning and the interests of the community may be damaged.”
On a single screen instant prices, important data, news, latest developments, comments and discussions at Chat! Come right away from your eyes!
There are those who support the proposal in the community as well as those who support the proposal. Some participants said that if the suggestion was rejected, they intend to leave Terra Luna Classic network. In spite of the discussions, there are also those who think that the decision -making mechanism needs to be improved.
Voting results and market effect
Voting results showed that the support given to the proposal was insufficient. The proportion of the proposal was 39.41 percent, while 7.95 percent of the vote was used. 25.47 percent of the veto vote was given. However, the total participation remained at the level of 28.95 percent and this rate was below the 40 percent threshold value required for validity.
Developments increased the division within the Terra Luna Classic community. The tension between those who do not want the decision -making mechanism to move away from the decentralized structure and those who advocate productivity continues.
In terms of the market, despite the controversy, there was no major change in the price of LUNC. However, it is stated that future decisions about the governance structure may affect market mobility.
Recently, the token burning in the Terra Luna Classic network is considered a positive development by the community. Approximately 400 billion toks are reported to be burned, this process can leave long -term effects on the value of the LUNC network.
Responsibility Rejection: The information contained in this article does not contain investment advice. Investors should be aware that crypto currencies carry high volatility and thus risk and carry out their operations in line with their own research.
